Disposed

Sumitra Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Allahabad HC11 Mar 2024A227/1191/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the pendency of mutation proceedings since October 2021. The Court disposed of the matter, dispensing with a notice to the private respondent and directing the Naib Tehsildar to decide the case expeditiously within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.-2 (Naib Tehsildar) to decide the pending mutation case most expeditiously within three months without unnecessary adjournment.

Sumitra Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue… — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21054

¶2

Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1191 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sumitra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶3

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶4

Heard.

¶5

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.

¶6

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶7

"(i) Issue order or direction to the opposite party no.2-Naib Tehsildar Rampur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide the case no.3895/2023 Computerized Case No.T202302570203895 Sumitra Vs Suresh Chandra in proceedings under section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 expediously within stipulated period of time in accordance with law."

¶8

In view of the settled principles of law that mutation proceedings being summary in nature, should preferably be decided expeditiously and the case in issue is pending since October 2021, this Court is of the view that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending.

¶9

Accordingly the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.-2 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Mutation case in Case No. 3895/2023 Computerized Case No.T202302570203895 (Sumitra Vs Suresh Chandra), most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.

¶10

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.3.2024

¶13

Jyoti/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sumitra Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumitra Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sundari and Ors. Vs Rahul Lekhwani and Another

Smt. Sita Devi and Ors. Vs Karamat Ali and Ors.

United India Insurance Company Ltd.Sultanpur Thro.B.Manager Vs Jag Prasad and Ors.

Savit Ram Objection Filed Vs Additional Commissioner Devipatan Mandal Gonda and Others

Muneshwar Dutt Mishra Vs Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Another

Sumitra Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others