In a writ petition under Article 227, the petitioner sought withdrawal after failing to identify a legal remedy. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the correct forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:19718
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1117 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Sonika Mishra @ Sonika Shukla Respondent :- The Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Krishna Srivastava,Nishant Singh,Surendra Kumar Tripathi,Sweta Swarankar
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition as he was unable to examine as to what legal remedy is available to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the correct/appropriate forum for ventilation of his grievances.
Order Date :- 5.3.2024 Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Sonika Mishra @ Sonika Shukla
The Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
