Single judge dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of amendment applications in a succession suit. The court held the applications were afterthoughts filed after evidence led in the original suit.
Writ petition dismissed; pending appeal to be decided expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:84206
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1031 of 2022
Petitioner :- Krishna Murari And Others Respondent :- Jyoti Alias Renu Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Mishra,Subhash Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Shikhar Anand
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order Date :- 16.12.2024
VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the rejection of amendment applications filed after evidence was led in the suit.
Whether the amendment application seeking to allege forgery of signatures was an afterthought to meet the evidence.
Whether the impugned order dismissing amendment applications requires interference under Article 227 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishna Murari And Others
Jyoti Alias Renu
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
