The writ petition challenging a suspension order was dismissed as infructuous after the suspension was revoked by the respondent authority via an order dated 16.1.2024.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:5026
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9982 of 2023
Petitioner :- Abhinav Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned Standing Counsel has provided the copy of the order dated 16.1.2024 by which the suspension order of the petitioner has been revoked, which is under challenge in the present writ petition.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the revocation of the suspension order, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 18.1.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Abhinav Singh
State Of U.P.
Manish Kumar
Nitesh Kumar Tewary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
