Disposed

Anil Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC7 Nov 2024/9975/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of cognizance and summoning orders. The court granted liberty to file a bail application and directed the trial court to decide it expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with liberty to file bail; direction to trial court to decide bail application expeditiously.

Anil Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73492

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9975 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Anil Kumar And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakar Shukla,Subodh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶7

The present application has been filed by the applicants seeking following main relief:-

¶8

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned complaint dated 26.04.2023 and order of cognizance and summoning order dated 18.09.2024 passed by learned IIIrd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No. 865/2023 Sada Pyari Vs. Anil Kumar & others" Under Section 323, 452, 506 IPC, Police Station Hyderabad, District Lakhimpur Kheri whereby petitioners have been summoned to face the trauma of trial."

¶9

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶10

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Order Date :- 7.11.2024 Arun/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anil Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manjesh and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Yadav @ Suraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Suneel Yadav @ Suneel Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Anil Kumar and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Udayraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Udayraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko