Disposed

Mohd. Ashraf and 184 Others v. State of U.P. Thur. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. and 28 Others

Allahabad HC23 Oct 2024/9557/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Teachers given additional charge as Head Master of other institutions sought payment of salary for that post. The court, relying on an earlier decision in Manoj Kumar, directed fresh representations to Basic Shiksha Adhikaris and their reasoned decision within six weeks, without deciding merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mohd. Ashraf and 184 Others Vs State of U.P. Thur… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71245

¶2

Court No. - 5

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9557 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Mohd. Ashraf And 184 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thur. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 28 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Singh,Kumar Ayush,Net Ram,Pradeep Tiwari,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav,Rishabh Tripathi,Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Shivam Sharma,Uday Veer Singh

¶6

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶7

1 . Heard Shri Durgesh Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel, Shri Abhinav Singh, Kumar Ayush, Net Ram, Pradeep Tiwari, Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav,Rishabh Tripathi, Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Shivam Sharma, Uday Veer Singh, learned counsels for the other contesting respondents.

¶8

2 . With the consent of the parties, the matter is being finally decided. 3 . Grievance of the petitioners is that despite they have been given additional charge of Head Master of other respective institutions, they are not being paid salary for the said post.

¶9

4 . It is contended that this aspect of the matter has already been considered by this Court in Writ A No.8948 of 2024 in Re: Manoj Kumar and 7 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others , decided on 01.07.2024

¶10

5 . Considering the aforesaid, let fresh individual representations be made to the concerned Basic Shiksha Adhikaris within a period of two weeks from today for redressal of their grievances. In case such representations are made, the concerned authority shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the judgment in the case of Manoj Kumar & Ors (supra) , if applicable, and pass a reasoned and speaking order within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶11

6 . With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶12

7 . It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioners.

¶13

Order Date :- 23.10.2024

¶14

prateek

¶15

Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd. Ashraf and 184 Others v. State of U.P. Thur. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. and 28 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mohd. Ashraf and 184 Others v. State of U.P. Thur. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. and 28 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chinta Haran Tripathi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Dugdha Vikas, Lko and 2 Others

Smt. Pranpati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Sarita Mishra @ Sarita Devi and Another Vs Union of India Thru. Ministry of Women and Child Development and 5 Others

Bakhshish Hasnain and Another vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Communication New Delhi and 2 Others

Chandrabali and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Higher Secondary Edu. Lko and 5 Others

Gyan Prakash and Others Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Communication and 2 Others