A writ petition concerning a private dispute over compensation money between the petitioner and his brother was dismissed as not maintainable, the court holding the matter was of a private nature and remedy lay elsewhere, with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73484-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9411 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Pal Singh,Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Verma,Prashant Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Sri Anurag Verma, Advocate, has filed his vakalatnama for the opp. party No. 4, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
We fail to understand as to how a writ petition is maintainable in a matter which essentially appears to be of a private nature between the petitioner and his brother regarding the compensation money. Remedy lies elsewhere. The petition is accordingly dismissed, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy .
( Brij Raj Singh, J. ) ( Rajan Roy, J. )
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable in a private dispute between the petitioner and his brother over compensation money.
Dhirendra Kumar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
