Allowed

Dilbag v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC2 Sept 2024/9334/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allows bail to the applicant, Dilbag, in a criminal matter under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The High Court granted bail primarily because the applicant had already been granted bail in the sole case included in the gang chart accompanying the opposing counsel's submissions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Dilbag Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:60213

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9334 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Dilbag Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Tushar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.173 of 2024 under section 2(b)(i)/3 U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Gola, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in one another case, which has been duly explained. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Dilbag be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 2.9.2024 VNP/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dilbag v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilbag v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manish Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Azeem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ram Anuj Mishra @ Babloo Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Dilip Kumar Lodh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and 3 Others

Abarar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another