Petitioners alleged electricity theft by two private parties and sought relief through writ petition. Court advised them to lodge an FIR or complaint, or invoke Section 175(3) BNSS if FIR not lodged, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71089-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9060 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vikas Tiwari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 7 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neera Yadav
Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
(Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 22.10.2024 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
What remedy should be provided to petitioners alleging electricity theft by private parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Tiwari And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko.
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
