In a writ petition by an employee aggrieved by termination by his service provider, the court observed that the service provider does not fall under Article 12. The petition was disposed of without the benefit of speaking order, leaving the petitioner to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73120
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9026 of 2024
Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Fateh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohammad Husain,Ritika Singh,Tushar Mittal
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2024
A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court can issue a writ against the service provider for termination of employment.
Whether the service provider falls within the ambit of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish Kumar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health U.P. Lko. And 3 Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
