Allowed

Amit Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Allahabad HC14 Aug 2024/8756/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed bail to Amit Pal accused under Sections 498A and 304B IPC in a matrimonial dispute, relying on reasoning adopted in a related order where his in-laws were released, noting his lack of criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Amit Pal was released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, undertaking to attend hearings, not commit similar offences, and not tamper with eviden

Amit Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56048

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8756 of 2024 Applicant :- Amit Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Rishi Dwivedi,Samrat Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶5

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Priyam Kumar Singh, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant and perused the record. The Vakalatnama is taken on record.

¶6

2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.234 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Sarojni Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶7

3 . It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the father-in-law was enlarged on bail vide order dated 30.07.2024 and the mother-in-law was enlarged on bail vide order dated 08.08.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8525 of 2024.

¶8

4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶9

5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in paras 3 and 5 of the order dated 30.07.2024 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 08.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶10

6. Let the applicant Amit Pal be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 14.8.2024 akverma

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amit Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lekhraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Masuk Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy.Deptt. of Home

Ram Naresh Sahu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Suraj Pal Alias Putti Lal Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sayeed Ahamd vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Uttam Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.