Allowed

Jitendra Kumar Mandal @ Jitendra Mandal v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Allahabad HC21 Sept 2024/8525/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application under Section 482 CrPC permitting the applicant to furnish a single set of sureties and personal bond to secure release on bail in five pending cheques and fraud cases. Relying on precedents, the bail granted in one case was held good for the others.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant directed to provide two sureties and bail bond in one case (Case crime no. 174/2020); this same security is to cover the remaining four cases.

Jitendra Kumar Mandal @ Jitendra Mandal Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65374

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8525 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Mandal @ Jitendra Mandal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Shashank Shekhar Singh

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶8

The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in five cases in which he was roped only one arrest and applicant has been granted bail in all the cases by the competent courts.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all the five cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the competent Courts. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases, registered against applicant at District-Lucknow are as under:-

¶10

Case crime no.174/2020, U/s- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 411, 34 I.P.C. and 66, 66C of Information Technology act at P.S. Hazratganj, District Lucknow.

¶11

Case crime no.28/2021, U/s- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. and 66, 66C, 66D and 43 of Information Technology act at P.S. Cyber Crime, District Lucknow.

¶12

Case crime no.30/2021, U/s- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. and 66, 66C, 66D and 43 of Information Technology act at P.S., Cyber Crime, District Lucknow.

¶13

Details of cases, registered against the applicant at DistrictHardoi are as under:-

¶14

Case crime no. 219/2021, U/s-406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471,

¶15

120-Β Ι.Ρ.C. and 66, 66C, 66D and 43 of Information Technology act at P.S Kotwali City, District- Hardoi.

¶16

Case crime no. 467/2021, U/s-406, 419, 420, 467, 468,471, 120-Β Ι.Ρ.C. and 66, 66C, 66D and 43 of Information Technology act at P.S Kotwali City, District- Hardoi.

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P .

¶18

Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.

¶19

Considering the observation made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and observation made by this Court in Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023), present application is allowed with direction that in case the applicant provides two sureties and bail bond in Case crime no.174/2020, U/s- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 411, 34 I.P.C. and 66, 66C of Information Technology act at P.S. Hazratganj, District Lucknow, then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant at District-Lucknow and Hardoi and applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties.

¶20

With the observation above, the present application is allowed. Order Date :- 21.9.2024 Vinay/-

¶21

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jitendra Kumar Mandal @ Jitendra Mandal v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar Mandal @ Jitendra Mandal v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Kaushal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Uday Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Civil Secy. Lko.

Shyamu Rawat Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Ravikant Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Nagendra Kumar @ Nagendra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Anand Kumar @ Sattan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another