The writ petition filed by the petitioner成为了多余，被以无益为由驳回。此前发布的任何临时命令撤消。
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73446
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8408 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rudra Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhisar Dev,Ashutosh Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prem Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Sri Abhisar Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that on account of subsequent developments the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rudra Pratap Singh
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
