The applicant sought to be in contempt. Counsel stated the underlying writ order was complied with. The court held the application had lost efficacy and dismissed it as infructuous.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:26830
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 813 of 2024
Applicant :- Meraj Ahmad Opposite Party :- Sri Shiv Naresh Singh, Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil-Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Kishan Prajapati,Atharva Arya
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 2.4.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application must be allowed when the impugned writ order has been complied with.
Meraj Ahmad
Sri Shiv Naresh Singh, Tehsildar (Judicial)
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
