the cold drink, she became unconscious and when she regained her senses, found herself in Lucknow. The victim also stated that the appellant also committed wrong with her and in one night, when the appellant was sleeping, she left the room and after coming to the village, narrated the incident to her family members. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the victim changed her version in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and implicated one other person in the incident. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the victim started blackmailing the appellant and when he tried to avoid her, the prosecution in question was initiated. It is vehemently submitted that the Investigating OfÏcer filed the charge sheet in mechanical manner without considering the contents of the statement of the victim. It is next submitted that as the charge sheet has been filed by the Investigating OfÏcer, there is no possibility of tampering of any evidence. It is lastly submitted that the court below has not considered all these facts while rejecting the bail application and there is no possibility of conclusion of trial in near future. It is, thus, submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the appellant, who does not have any criminal antecedent and is in jail since 03.11.2023, is entitled for bail. It is also submitted that the appellant is ready to cooperate in the trial.
