Dismissed

Saiyad Ali Ahamar and Another v. Raident Academic Improvement Society, Hardoi and Another

Allahabad HC12 Sept 2024/7882/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interlocutory order that summoned records and secured a status-quo during a revision proceeding. The court held no accentuating circumstances warranted intervention and left the maintenance objection for the revisional court to decide after a full hearing.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty to contest revision and raise objections reserved.

Saiyad Ali Ahamar and Another Vs Raident Academic… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63078

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7882 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Saiyad Ali Ahamar And Another Respondent :- Raident Academic Improvement Society, Hardoi And Another

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shresth Agarwal,Pooja Singh,Ram Khelawan Singh

¶6

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶7

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.2 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing Counsel.

¶9

Under challenge is the order dated 12.06.2024 whereby the respondent No.2 has merely entertained the revision preferred by the private-respondent No.1 and by the said order, the record of the trial Court has been summoned and in the interim period the parties have been directed to maintain the status-quo.

¶10

The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they had filed a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the revision, however, no finding in that context was given by the Court concerned while passing of the impugned order dated 12.06.2024. Since, these proceedings are summary in nature and the name of the petitioners was recorded on the basis of gift-deed made in favour of the trust, hence, the order impugned is bad in the eyes of law.

¶11

Having considered the aforesaid submissions and noticing the fact that the order dated 12.06.2024 is only an interlocutory in nature inasmuch as the revision has been entertained for hearing and the records have been summoned and till then the parties have been directed to maintain status-quo does not appear any accentuating circumstances which may persuade this Court to entertain the instant petition at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioners to contest the revision and raise objections as may be available in law. Needless to say that the revisional Court shall pass a reasoned and a speaking order while disposing of the revision but after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties.

¶12

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed .

¶13

Order Date :- 12.9.2024 Rakesh/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Saiyad Ali Ahamar and Another v. Raident Academic Improvement Society, Hardoi and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saiyad Ali Ahamar and Another v. Raident Academic Improvement Society, Hardoi and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Yogesh Kumar Vs Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member and Others

Parsnath @ Parsnath Udayaraj Chauhan Vs Sub District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Ors.

Abhay Khare Vs Estate of Late Shri Ram Prakash and Others

Mukeem Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Adarsh Nigam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 4 Others

Ashok Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.