A father sought eviction of his son and daughter-in-law via a direct writ petition. The High Court held that a writ proceeding is not the remedy and directed him to seek relief under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:70559-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7639 of 2024
Petitioner :- Parmeshwar Deen Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad,Kunwar Abhimanyu Rana,Rakesh Kumar,Surendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 Gurpreet Singh
Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is the appropriate remedy for a parent seeking eviction of his son and daughter-in-law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parmeshwar Deen
State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Ayodhya
Opposite Party No.4 (son of petitioner)
Opposite Party No.5 (daughter-in-law of petitioner)
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
