Disposed

Smt. Asha Singh v. Civil Judge (J.D) Room Number 23, Distt. Pratapgarh and 5 Others

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2024/750/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition under Article 227, the Allahabad High Court directed the Civil Judge at Pratapgarh to decide an expeditious application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC within six weeks, granting hearing opportunities without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the lower court to consider and decide the pending application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC most expeditiously within six weeks.

Smt. Asha Singh Vs Civil Judge (J.D) Room… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14269

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 750 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Asha Singh Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D) Room Number 23, Distt. Pratapgarh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manuvendra Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 to 6 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.2235 of 2021, pending before the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Room No.23, District Pratapgarh.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Room No.23, District Pratapgarh to consider and decide the pending application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.2235 of 2021 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Court concerned.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 19.2.2024 Rakesh/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Asha Singh v. Civil Judge (J.D) Room Number 23, Distt. Pratapgarh and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Asha Singh v. Civil Judge (J.D) Room Number 23, Distt. Pratapgarh and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Datt Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Ram Shanker Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

Vidya Singh Vs Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Dukhram and Another Vs Arjun Prasad and 2 Others

Jitendra Kumar and Others Vs Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Ajay Kumar Yadav Vs Civil Judge (Junior Division) South, Room No. 24, Distt. Sultanpur and Another