Ramu and Anr. v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled listing date despite receiving a prior order warning that persistent absence would lead to dismissal for want of prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected for want of prosecution due to applicant's non-appearance despite prior warning.