Disposed

Ranjeet @ Ghaseete v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC14 Aug 2024/7160/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of an application for bail under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 528 BNSS. The court directed the lower court to accept a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties per case, allowing this condition to cover all seven pending cases against the applicant.

What did the court decide?

The Court below directed to execute a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and produce two sureties of Rs. 20,000 in one case, applicable to all seven cases.

Ranjeet @ Ghaseete Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56044

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7160 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ranjeet @ Ghaseete Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Singh,Anurag Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS"), has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all seven cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all seven cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Unnao are as follows:-

¶9

(i) Case Crime No. 663 of 2023, under Sections 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali

¶10

(ii) Case Crime No. 561 of 2023, under Sections 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali

¶11

(iii)Case Crime No. 104 of 2022, under Sections 380/457/411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali

¶12

(iv) Case Crime No. 499 of 2023, under Sections 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali

¶13

(v) Case Crime No. 234 of 2023, under Sections 379/411/413/414 I.P.C., Police Station Dahi

¶14

(vi) Case Crime No. 658 of 2023, under Sections 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali

¶15

(vii)Case Crime No. 339 of 2023, under Sections 379/411 I.P.C., Police Station Gangaghat Unnao

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.

¶17

Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.

¶18

In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases.

¶19

Order Date :- 14.8.2024

¶20

Jyoti/-

¶21

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ranjeet @ Ghaseete v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet @ Ghaseete v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rais Alam and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Ram Suresh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sheikh Mohammad Shariq Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and Another

Aftab Alias Md. Aftab and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Chandan Gupta and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Satyam Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another