In an application under Section 482 CrPC heard on 13.11.2024, the applicant failed to appear. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution, noting the applicant was not keen to pursue the case.
Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74993
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7061 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Poddar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gayatri Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
"As prayed, list/put up this case in the next week as fresh.
It is made clear that mere pendency of this application shall not be treated as an interim protection to the applicant."
Order Date :- 13.11.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in appearing for the hearing of the application under Section 482 CrPC warrants dismissal for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kumar Poddar
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
