In matters under Article 227, the petitioner was represented by counsel who submitted that a filing of an undertaking made the petition infructuous, resulting in dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14132
Court No. - 5
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6257 of 2023
Petitioner :- R.K. Shukla Respondent :- Ravindra Srivastava Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Srivastava
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Shri Anoop Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of subsequent development including the filing of the undertaking today in SCC Revision No.51 of 2016, the petition is rendered infructuous and prays that the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.2.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
R.K. Shukla
Ravindra Srivastava
Abdul Moin
Shashank Shivhare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
