Writ petitioner assailed an order under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court held the petition was misconceived due to the existence of alternate statutory remedies and lack of merit. The petition was dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed for lack of merit and existence of alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:48722
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6172 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Bahadur
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Revenue) Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kirti Mishra,Rupa Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
impugned order.
Order Date :- 19.7.2024 A. Verma
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable given the alternate remedy of appeal under Section 35(2).
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Bahadur
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Revenue) Lko.
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
