The petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition because it was not pressed by the learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:54536
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6138 of 2024
Petitioner :- Head Constable (Civil Police) Suresh Kannaujiya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel-II for the State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that he may be permitted to not press this writ petition, hence, the same may be dismissed as such.
3. Accordingly, at this stage, the instant writ petition is dismissed being not pressed.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 8.8.2024 Suresh/
Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Head Constable (Civil Police) Suresh Kannaujiya
State Of U.P.
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
