Naniya Hansh v. U.O.I.
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismissed a bail application as infructuous because counsel informed the court that the underlying criminal trial had already concluded.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:69740
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6102 of 2021
Applicant :- Naniya Hansh Opposite Party :- U.O.I. Counsel for Applicant :- Narvind Kumar Singh,Atul Verma,Hari Krishna Verma,Kanchan Verma,Preeti Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Akhilesh Awasthi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
- Sri Hari Krishna Verma, advocate, holding brief of Sri Atul Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Awasthi, counsel for N.C.B have jointly informed that the trial has already been concluded in Sessions Trial No. 400 of 2021 as such, the instant bail application has become infructuous.
- In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsels for the parties, the instant bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
- Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 16.10.2024 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Naniya Hansh
- respondent
U.O.I.
Coram
Prakash Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- /6102/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohammad Suhail Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Madan Murari and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another
Amar Bahadur Gharti Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko
Shiva vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lko.