Allowed

Rinku Kushwaha Alias Sonveer v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Jul 2024/6037/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Lucknow exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the criminal complaint under Section 306 IPC. The court held that the complaint filed without antecedents and with a minor complainant deserved to be quashed. The applicant, a 17-year-old minor, was freed and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

The complaint under Section 306 IPC and Sections 3/4 IPC were quashed, and the applicant was liberated and set free.

Rinku Kushwaha Alias Sonveer Vs State of U.P… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:46505

¶2

Court No. - 20

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6037 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Rinku Kushwaha Alias Sonveer Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1& ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 482 na0 iz0 la0 vkosnd dh vksj ls bl ;kpuk ds lkFk ;ksftr fd;k x;k gS fd l= ijh{k.k la[;k 1199 o"kZ 2022] eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 182 o"kZ 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 376 Hkk0 na0 la0 ,oa /kkjk 3@4 ikDlks vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk VfM;koka] ftyk gjnksbZ ¼jkT; izfr fjadw dq’kokgk½ esa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fnukafdr 13&3&2024 tks fo}ku l= U;k;k/kh’k gjnksbZ }kjk ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ,oa izsf"kr iwjd vkjksi i= la[;k 269,@2022 fnukafdr 23&12&2022 dks fujLr fd;k tk,A

¶8

2&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶9

3&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fof/k laxr ugha gSA foospd }kjk iwjd vkjksi i= U;k;ky; esa izsf"kr djrs le; xyr <ax ls Hkk0 na0 la0 dh /kkjk 376 dh c<ksRRkjh dh x;h gS tc fd izkjEHk esa iz’uxr izkFkfedh Hkk0 na0 la0 dh /kkjk 306 ds vUrxZr ntZ djk;h x;h FkhA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} ftl izdkj ls vkjksi yxk;s x;s gS mlls mRizs"k.k dk vkjksi vkosnd ds fo:} ugha curk gSA iz’uxr ekeys esa Hkk0 na0 la0 dh /kkjk 107 ds vO;;ksa dk iw.kZr;k yksi gSA bl vk/kkj ij vkosnd ds fo:} /kkjk 306 Hkk0 na0 la0 dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gSA vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd iz’uxr ekeys esa Hkk0 na0 la0 dh /kkjk 376 ,oa ikDlksa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3@4 dh tks c<ksRrjh dh x;h gS og xyr gSA

¶10

4&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds dFkuksa dk fojks/k fd;k x;k ,oa dFku fd;k x;k fd ihfMrk ?kVuk ds le; vo;Ld Fkh] ftldh vk;q ?kVuk ds le; 17 o"kZ

¶11

FkhA fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh vk[;k ds vuqlkj cykRdkj dh iqf"V gqbZ gS rFkk Mh0 ,u0 ,0 fjiksVZ Hkh vkosnd ls esy [kkrh gSA

¶12

5&izdj.k ds leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDRkkx.k ds rdksZ dk voyksdu djus ds mijkUr ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr rych iz’uxr vkns’k fof/k laxr gS] ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr rych vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gSA

¶13

6&rnuqlkj ;g orZeku izkFkZuk i= cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶14

7&rnuqlkj ;g orZeku izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶15

Order Date :- 9.7.2024 A.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rinku Kushwaha Alias Sonveer v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku Kushwaha Alias Sonveer v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Akhtarunnisha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue , Lucknow and Others

Dayawati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 6 Others

Kamlesh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Matsya Govt. Lko. and 3 Others

Subhash Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. Lko. and and Another

Shrvan Kumar @ Shravan Kumar Arkvanshi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Bablu Alias Suresh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another