A petition filed under Article 227 was withdrawn at the counsel's request with liberty to pursue the remedy elsewhere; the bench dismissed it as withdrawn and took on record the opposite party's Vakalatnama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78613
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5684 of 2024
Petitioner :- Matru Lal And 2 Others Respondent :- Omaxe Private Limited New Delhi By Competent Authority And Local Office Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- Hairdaya Narain Tiwari,Ankit Kumar Pandey,Atul Tiwari,Hari Mangal Singh
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue his remedy elsewhere.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3 . This order has been passed in the presence of Sri V.K.S. Bisen and Sri Ram Kumar Verma, who have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party. The Vakalatnama is taken on record.
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Matru Lal And 2 Others
Omaxe Private Limited New Delhi By Competent Authority And Local Office Lucknow
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
