Ram Nath Vishwakarma Vs Addl. Chief Judical Magistrate Kunda Pratapgarh and Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58741

Court No. - 11

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 568 of 2024

Applicant :- Ram Nath Vishwakarma Opposite Party :- Addl. Chief Judical Magistrate Kunda Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State.

¶7

2. Instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C (Now Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) has been filed praying for a direction to the learned court below to expeditiously decide the proceedings pending before it.

¶8

3. On the other hand learned AGA on the basis of Constitution Bench judgment in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P and Ors- 2024 (256) AIC 66 (SC) argues that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the constitutional Courts should not normally fix a time-bound schedule for disposal of cases pending in any Court. It has further been held in the said judgment that the issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending.

¶9

4. Considering the aforesaid Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad (supra) the instant application is disposed of permitting the applicant to move an application before the concerned Court pointing out the grounds of urgency. In the event, the applicant does so, the concerned Court may consider whether the case should be expedited having regard to the urgency of the case.

¶10

Order Date :- 28.8.2024 S. Shivhare

¶11

Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Nath Vishwakarma v. Addl. Chief Judical Magistrate Kunda Pratapgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Nath Vishwakarma v. Addl. Chief Judical Magistrate Kunda Pratapgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rama Kant Tiwari vs U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Thru. the Managing Director Lko. and 2 Others

Rana Pratap vs U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Thru. Chairman Lko. and 4 Others

Ramsingar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and Others

Bhagwat Kishore Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Sarvesh Kumar Yadav vs M/S Indira Gas and Petroleum Pvt. Ltd. Thru Director Sashi Bhushan

Vinod Kashyap and 6 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. and Another