Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant stated he had no instructions on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:54321
Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 567 of 2022 Applicant :- Kuldeep Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Case called out.
Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA is present.
On previous date i.e. 23.03.2023, no one had appeared for the applicant, however, last opportunity was provided to the applicant to argue the matter.
Today when the matter has been taken up, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.8.2024 R.C.
Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kuldeep Sharma
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
