Disposed

Jyotsna Singh v. Union of India Thru. Ministry of Women and Child Development New Delhi and 5 Others

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2024/5250/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court ordered State Government to expedite decision on absorption or preference for contractual employees transitioning from Mahila Shakti Kendra to Hub for Empowerment of Women Scheme. Pending decision, employees to remain on posts and honorarium to be paid per Central guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Additional Chief Secretary to decide on absorption/preference; continuation of petitioners on posts until decision;

Jyotsna Singh Vs Union of India Thru. Ministry of… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65918

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5250 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Jyotsna Singh Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Umesh Singh

¶5

And

¶6

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5668 of 2024

¶7

Petitioner :- Priyanka Balmiki Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Atul Kumar Singh,C.S.C. And

¶8

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5768 of 2024

¶9

Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pal And Another Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶10

And

¶11

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5794 of 2024

¶12

Petitioner :- Ruchi Sharma Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶13

And

¶14

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5796 of 2024

¶15

Petitioner :- Rekha Gupta Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others

¶16

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. And

¶17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5816 of 2024

¶18

Petitioner :- Priyanka Pandey Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Women And Child Development, New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶19

And

¶20

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5967 of 2024

¶21

Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Arya Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Women And Child Development, New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶22

And

¶23

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5988 of 2024

¶24

Petitioner :- Jaya Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶25

And

¶26

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6048 of 2024

¶27

Petitioner :- Shefali Singh And Another Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Womem And Child Development And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶28

And

¶29

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6228 of 2024

¶30

Petitioner :- Astuti Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Women

¶31

And Child Development And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶32

And

¶33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6483 of 2024

¶34

Petitioner :- Sushma Kashyap Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Women And Child Development Govt. India New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Umesh Singh

¶35

And

¶36

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6489 of 2024

¶37

Petitioner :- Nidhi Srivastava Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Women And Child Development , New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Umesh Singh

¶38

And

¶39

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7013 of 2024

¶40

Petitioner :- Sandhya Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Women And Child Development New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Singh,Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.

¶41

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶42

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Umesh Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 1 and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 2 to 6.

¶43

Petition has been filed challenging order dated 20.06.2024 in Writ-A No. 5250 of 2024 while challenging alleged oral orders of termination in the other connected writ petitions. Further prayer for issuance of a direction to the concerned authority to permit petitioner to discharge their duties on the respective post in the Hub for Empowerment of Women Scheme from the relevant post held by petitioner under the Mahila Shakti Kendra Scheme in pursuance of directions dated 17.10.2023 has been

¶44

sought alongwith prayer for remuneration to petitioner.

¶45

On 12.07.2024, the following order had been passed:-

¶46

"Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Umesh Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and learned State counsel for opposite parties no.2 to 5.

¶47

Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.

¶48

Learned State counsel is granted three days' time to seek instructions in this matter particularly with regard to the fact as to whether petitioner being a contractual employee is being replaced by another contractual employee.

¶49

List this case on 19.07.2024, as fresh. "

¶50

Whereafter on 19.07.2024, the following order had been passed:-

¶51

"1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.

¶52

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Umesh Singh, learned counsel for Union of India and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

¶53

3. In pursuance of directions issued earlier, learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 18.07.2024 as per which it has been submitted that the earlier scheme of Mahila Shakti Kendra has been discontinued and a new scheme has been introduced by the Central Government vide notification dated 14.07.2022 under the name District Hub for Empowerment of Women due to which the services of petitioner have been discontinued and no other contractual employee has replaced petitioner.

¶54

4. In response thereto, learned counsel for petitioner has drawn attention to the letter dated 17.10.2023 issued by the Director, Women Welfare, State of U.P. to submit that the said letter clearly indicates the fact that although the earlier scheme has been discontinued w.e.f. 31.03.2022 but is to be subsumed under the new scheme and directions have also been issued for absorbing persons such as petitioner who were engaged under the earlier scheme.

¶55

5. It is also submitted that petitioner's contract dated 01.02.2019 clearly indicates the fact that petitioner engagement would continue till the Mahila Shakti Kendra Scheme continued but has also adverted to the fact that since petitioner is to be subsumed/absorbed in the new scheme, there was no occasion for the opposite parties to pass the impugned order.

¶56

6. With regard to aforesaid, learned State Counsel is granted ten days' time to file a short affidavit.

¶57

7. List this case on 02.08.2024, as fresh. Learned counsel for Union of India shall also obtain instructions as to whether the persons employed on

¶58

contractual basis under the earlier MSK Scheme are required to be absorbed/continued under the new scheme. "

¶59

In pursuance thereto, supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 & 3 is taken on record.

¶60

While learned counsel for petitioner has reiterated the submissions advanced earlier pertaining to absorption of petitioner under the Hub for Empowerment of Women Scheme, learned State Counsel has adverted to paragraph 16 of the supplementary counter affidavit filed today to submit that as yet there is no proposal for absorption of persons working under the Mahila Shakti Kendra Scheme to under the Hub for Empowerment of Women Scheme. It is submitted that a resolution has thereafter been passed on 23.08.2024 to the effect that persons working under the old Scheme would be given preference for recruitment in the new Scheme and in terms thereof, cases of petitioners would also be considered in the same light.

¶61

However, he has not been able to explain the directions issued on 17.10.2023.

¶62

It has been submitted by learned State Counsel that matter as of now is pending consideration before the State Government pertaining to grant of approval for initiating recruitment process under the new Scheme and for granting preference to persons such as petitioners who were employed on contract basis under the old Scheme.

¶63

Considering the letter dated 17.10.2023 and the proposal dated 23.08.2024, it becomes evident that the aspect pertaining to absorption of such as petitioner engaged under the earlier Scheme or for purposes of providing preference to them under recruitment to be made under new Scheme is required to be considered by the State Government.

¶64

In view thereof, the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Government of U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow is directed to take a final decision with regard to the aforesaid aspects expeditiously prior to granting approval for recruitment to be made under the Hub for Empowerment of Women Scheme specifically as to whether persons such as petitioners employed under the Mahila Shakti Kendra Scheme are required to be absorbed under the new Scheme or merely to be provided preference in recruitment to be initiated for the same.

¶65

In view of letter dated 17.10.2023 as well as the fact that as

¶66

yet no new recruitment have been made by the opposite parties for smooth operation of the schemes, it is directed that till decision is taken by the State Government, petitioners will be continued on their respective posts either under the old or the new Schemes whichever may be in force.

¶67

The State Government shall also take a decision with regard to payment of honorarium to petitioners for work rendered by them. Decision shall be taken in terms of directions and guidelines issued by the Central Government on the aforesaid aspect.

¶68

With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.

¶69

Order Date :- 23.9.2024 Satish

¶70

Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jyotsna Singh v. Union of India Thru. Ministry of Women and Child Development New Delhi and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyotsna Singh v. Union of India Thru. Ministry of Women and Child Development New Delhi and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vibha Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Surat Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry. of Communication New Delhi and 2 Others

Adarsh Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Edu. and Ors.

Ashish Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Manish Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Dinesh Chandra Sharma vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry O Communication and 2 Others