Allowed

Sunny @ Suryoday v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC10 May 2024/5112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal bail application, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant who was already on bail in other cases of the same gang. The applicant was in custody since July 2023. The court allowed the release on surety bond with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned court.

Sunny @ Suryoday Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36233

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5112 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sunny @ Suryoday Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mrs.Suniti Sachan,Gangeshwar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. Priyanka Yadav, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. Other cases are duly explained in the bail application. He further submitted that coaccused has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 19.03.2024. The applicant is in custody since 17.07.2023.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Sunny @ Suryoday be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 333 of 2023, under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Paliya, District Lakhimpur Kheri, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like

¶11

amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶14

and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 10.5.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sunny @ Suryoday v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny @ Suryoday v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anurag Pal Vs state of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home

Rekha Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.

Mithlesh Singh @ Ratnesh Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Awdhesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Sunny @ Suryoday vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Rekha Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another