Disposed

P.B.R. Inter College Gausganj Distt. Hardoi Thru. Manager Achin Singh Patel v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 11 Others

Allahabad HC5 Feb 2024/490/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 227, the court directed the State authority to decide a pending revision under the U.P. Revenue Code within six months due to significant delay causing hardship to the petitioner, while clarifying that the writ court did not examine the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direct the authority to decide the pending revision within six months from the next date fixed, avoiding unnecessary adjournments.

P.B.R. Inter College Gausganj Distt. Hardoi Thru… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:10544

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 490 of 2024 Petitioner :- P.B.R. Inter College Gausganj Distt. Hardoi Thru. Manager Achin Singh Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr.Surendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard.

¶6

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.

¶7

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶8

"a. to issue a order or direction commanding the Opposite Party No. 2 to dispose of the Revision under section 210 of U.P. Revenue code 2006, registered as Case No. 79/2022 Computer case No. C202210000000079 PBR Inter College, Gausganj, Hardoi Versus Ram Kumar and others pending in the Court Additional Commissioner (Administration) Lucknow Division Lucknow since 17.01.2022 expeditiously preferably within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

¶9

It is stated that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2022 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, is suffering great hardship and mental agony. Prayer is to direct the authority concerned to decide the case within stipulated time.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned to decide the pending revision within 6 months from the next date fixed in the matter, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation. For conducting the proceedings in the time specified, unnecessary adjournments be avoided.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 5.2.2024 Jyoti/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

P.B.R. Inter College Gausganj Distt. Hardoi Thru. Manager Achin Singh Patel v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.B.R. Inter College Gausganj Distt. Hardoi Thru. Manager Achin Singh Patel v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bramha Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation and Others

Smt. Guddi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Mohammad Sabir Vs State of U.P. Thru. Sub Divisional Magistrate Judicial Dist. Sultanpur and 7 Others

Jag Prasad Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Officer Gonda and 37 Others

Ram Behari Singh Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Hardoi Camp at Unnao and 5 Others

Hari Prasad Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Renenue U.P. Lko. and 4 Others