Disposed

Smt. Ganga Devi v. Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil Rudaulu Dist. Ayodhya and Another

Allahabad HC22 Oct 2024/4880/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a matter under Article 227, the court directed the respondent authority to expeditiously dispose of pending revenue proceedings without unnecessary adjournments and required the petitioner to furnish an undertaking to cooperate in the process.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to dispose of Case No. 2773 of 2023 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

Smt. Ganga Devi Vs Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71254

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4880 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Ganga Devi Respondent :- Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil Rudaulu Dist. Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Maurya,Satyam Maurya,Virendra Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Case No.2773 of 2023; Computerized Case no.T202304230702773 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.2773 of 2023; Computerized Case no.T202304230702773 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶12

The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner

¶13

shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶14

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶15

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶16

Order Date :- 22.10.2024 Harshita

¶17

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Ganga Devi v. Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil Rudaulu Dist. Ayodhya and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Ganga Devi v. Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil Rudaulu Dist. Ayodhya and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nitin Kumar Srivastava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sabira Khatoon and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri and Others

Rameshvar Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief / Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt. , Lucknow and Others

Shree Ganga Ram Das Baba Institute of Pharmacy, Thru. President, Rajendra Singh Yadav and Anr. vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Education, Lko. and Others

Smt. Bhagmata Vs Nayab Tahsildar Mawai Tahsil Rudauli Dist. Ayodhya and Another

Fakhre Alam Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Gonda Now Balrampur and Others