Petitioner qualified the Ph.D. (Law) entrance exam at University of Lucknow but was not called for interview. After court intervention he was interviewed but did not qualify on merit; his RTI application covered the answer key request. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45851
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4589 of 2024
Petitioner :- Aseem Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Savitra Vardhan Singh
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
interview and merit list has already been declared where the petitioner could not qualify as the qualified candidates have secured more marks than the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer no.2 stands satisfied.
Order Date :- 5.7.2024 KR
(Alok Mathur,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a qualified EWS candidate in the Ph.D. (Law) entrance test, should be called for interview and admitted per Clause 5.2.4(b) of the Ph.D. Ordinance 2023.
Whether the University should provide the petitioner's question paper and answer key.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aseem Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 2 Others
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
