Ikhlakh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
S.482 application dismissed as misconceived; challenge to Recovery Warrant dated 31.1.2024 of court below; earlier Tahsildar recovery warrants dated 29.10.2011 (Rs.1,33,900/-) and 06.01.2020 (Rs.1,13,400/-) in Cri. Misc. Case No.1025/2014, Jahida Bano vs Eklakh, not challenged; execution of ACJM Court No.20 Sultanpur judgment dated 23.2.2010 granting Rs.300/- per month maintenance to applicant's two daughters; applicant Ikhlakh vs State of U.P. and others; counsel Surendra Kumar Mishra; coram Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; decided 15.5.2024; Neutral Citation 2024:AHC-LKO:37254.
What did the court decide?
The applicant had not challenged the earlier recovery warrants dated 29.10.2011 (Rs.1,33,900/-) and 06.01.2020 (Rs.1,13,400/-) issued through the Tahsildar in Cri. Misc. Case No.1025/2014, Jahida Bano vs Eklakh, passed in execution of the ACJM Court No.20, Sultanpur judgment dated 23.2.2010 granting the applicant's two daughters Rs.300/- per month.