In a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of an execution case, the High Court dismissed the petition in the absence of service of notice on all opposite parties and noted a defect regarding the impleadment of the Civil Judge as an opposite party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64894
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4477 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Bahadur
Respondent :- Civil Judge Senior Division F.T.C. Ambedkar Nagar And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav,Amit Kumar
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
no direction for expeditious disposal of case can be issued by this Court.
Order Date :- 19.9.2024 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether service of notice on all opposite parties is required before issuing a direction for expeditious disposal of an execution case.
Whether the Civil Court ought to be impleaded as an opposite party in a writ petition under Article 227.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Savitri Devi Vs. District Judge, GorakhpurReferred¶10
Savitri Devi Vs. District Judge, Gorakhpur ; (1999) 2 SCC 577 · Who else cites this
Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of GujratReferred¶10
Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of Gujrat , (2015) 9 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Ram Bahadur
Civil Judge Senior Division F.T.C. Ambedkar Nagar
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
