Vikas v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A PIL petition was filed by Vikas under Article 226, challenging encroachments on government land via applications dated June 2022 and December 2023 filed with the District Collector.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39187
Court No. - 19
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 442 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vikas
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla,Atul Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
- ययाचचिकयाकरयाቔኋ कके चविदयान अधधिविकया शቦኍ रयाजकेश ककमयार श क लया, अपर मकख्य स्थयायቦኍ अधधिविकया शቦኍ लቌኚमቦኍ ममोहन खरके वि चविपकቦኍ ससं० 5 गयाम सभया कके चविदयान अधधिविकया शቦኍ ममोहन धससंह कमो सकनया रथया पतयाविलቦኍ कया अविलमोकन चकयया।
- भयाररቦኍय ससंचविधियान कके अनकच्छकेद 226 कके असंररቔኋर ्ቚस्रकर इस जनचहर ययाचचिकया दयारया ययाचचिकयाकरयाቔኋ नके यह ्ቚयाथቔኋनया ककी हहै चक चविपकቦኍ ससं० 6 दयारया चिक मयारቔኋ ककी भभूचम रयाटया ससं० 244 ककेतफल 0.0270 हके० सस्थर गयाम अधधिययारቦኍ, पररनया चियासंदया, रहसቦኍल लम्भकआ, जनपद सकल्रयानपकर पर चकए रए अचर्ቅमण कमो हटयाए जयानके हकेरक चविपकቦኍ ससं० 2 सके 4 कमो चनदरश चदए जयानके कया अनकरमोधि चकयया हहै।
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the filing of applications regarding boundary removal under Article 226 is time-barred.
Whether the High Court possesses extraordinary jurisdiction to adjudicate encroachment regardless of limitation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vikas
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Subhash Vidyarthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- /442/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Subhash Vidyarthi
- Order 2 — this page · Subhash Vidyarthi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court