The High Court at Lucknow, by Sultanpur Bench, examined a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the inaction of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) regarding a Peh-Chalan filed in a high pecuniary limit case after the registered complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63609
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4396 of 2024
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar And 2 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 25,Sultanpur And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
याथቔኋनया-पत कके चविरु्ቍ ककोई आपधቈኌ ्ቚस्रसुर नहीሻ ककी हहै रथया न्ययाययालय उसकके ्ቚयाथቔኋनयापत कया चनस्रयारण नहीሻ कर रहया हहै।
[Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 13.9.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Judge should have taken cognizance of the Peh-Chalan filed after the registered complaint.
Whether the lower court should have dismissed the application under Section 251 Cr.P.C without recording statements.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar And 2 Others
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 25, Sultanpur And 3 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
