Disposed

Aman Deep Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC10 Sept 2024/4339/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expedited disposal of a pending revenue case. Court directed the relevant authority to decide the matter expeditiously without adjournments but did not examine the case on merits. Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

This Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served by keeping the petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide

Aman Deep Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62402

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4339 of 2024 Petitioner :- Aman Deep Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.3 and 4 is dispensed with.

¶7

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.Rev/712/2017/Lakhimpur Kheri, Computerized Case No. R2017104300712, (Manjeet Kaur Vs. Manjeet Kaur) filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 pending before the respondent No.2.

¶8

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.Rev/712/2017/Lakhimpur Kheri, Computerized Case No. R2017104300712, (Manjeet Kaur Vs. Manjeet Kaur) filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 10.9.2024/Asheesh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Aman Deep Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Deep Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pannalal Vs Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kadipur, Sultanpur and Others

Ram Manoratha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Smt. Ranjana Devi Vs Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Palak Jain vs Praful Kumar Jain

Jiya Ram Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. and 15 Others

Aman Deep Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. and 3 Others