Allowed

Gulfam v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2024/4324/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Allahabad allowed bail to the applicant in a criminal miscellaneous application. The bench observed that since the applicant was already on bail in the sole case in the gang chart, the present bail prayer was accepted. The applicant must execute a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 11 of 2024 under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 on personal bond with two sureties.

Gulfam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31283

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4324 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Gulfam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Diwakar Goyal,Sapna Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The applicant is in custody since 10.02.2024.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Gulfam be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 11 of 2024, under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Than Gaon, District Sitapur, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶13

and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 22.4.2024 Arun

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Gulfam v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulfam v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sarik Vs State of U.P.Thru. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Bablu Nishad @ Candy Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vishnu Kumar Dwivedi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Deptt. Lko.

Gulfam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Rajendra Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Seth vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.