Disposed

Rajpati v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Another

Allahabad HC10 May 2024/4216/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition by directing the Tehsildar to decide mutation proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act within three months, after providing an opportunity of hearing. The court also directed parties to avoid unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tehsildar to decide mutation proceedings in Suit No. 213 of 2008 under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act within three months after hearing parties.

Rajpati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow… — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36585

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4216 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajpati

¶4

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Gupta,Anil Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

¶7

Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide mutation proceedings in Suit No.213 of 2008 (Rajpati Vs. Chhedi Lal) under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide mutation proceedings in Suit No.213 of 2008 (Rajpati Vs. Chhedi Lal) under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

¶11

It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.

¶12

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶13

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶14

Order Date :- 10.5.2024 RKM.

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rajpati v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajpati v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Suman and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

Mohd. Hameed and Another Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur and Others

Diwakar and Another Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Pratapgarh and Others

Aakriti Makheja Vs U.P. Tourism Department Thru. Director General, Paryatan Bhawan,Lko. and 4 Others

Sabiha Begam Vs District Judge, Bahraich and Others

Smt. Suman Vs Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 24, Lucknow and Others