The application for quashment under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:25230
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4052 of 2018
Applicant :- Raj Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Shailendra Kr. Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the application has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as such.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 21.3.2024 prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raj Kumar Srivastava
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
