Allowed

Mohd. Shaan v. Addl. Commissioner Administration, Lucknow and Others

Allahabad HC27 Aug 2024/4007/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a pending appeal relating to the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the Court directed the respondent to decide the matter quickly without unnecessary adjournments while ensuring a full hearing opportunity, noting no merits were examined.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No. 1 to decide Appeal No. 2713 of 2022 expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments, affording full hearing opportunity.

Mohd. Shaan Vs Addl. Commissioner… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58153

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4007 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Mohd. Shaan

¶5

Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Administration, Lucknow And Others

¶6

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey

¶7

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 16 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Notice on behalf of respondent No.17 is accepted by learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.

¶9

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 to 15 is dispensed with.

¶10

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Appeal No.2713 of 2022 (Computerized Case No.C202210000002713) in Re: Kalideen and Other Vs. Shahabul Haq and Others, under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the court of respondent No.1.

¶11

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided.

¶12

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Appeal No.2713 of 2022 (Computerized Case No.C202210000002713) in Re: Kalideen and Other Vs. Shahabul Haq and Others as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Court concerned.

¶14

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No.1 shall

¶15

decide the aforesaid case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶16

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶17

Order Date :- 27.8.2024 S. Shivhare

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd. Shaan v. Addl. Commissioner Administration, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Shaan v. Addl. Commissioner Administration, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S J.P. Nirman and Company,Barabanki Thru. Its Proprietor Jay Prakash Pandey vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Govt. of India Ministry of Labour and Deptt. of Employment,New Delhi and 2 Ors.

Sonal Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Balighur Rahman vs Waqf Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow, Thru. Chairman and 6 Others

Ajroon Nisha vs Nayab Tehsildar Masaudha, Tehsil- Sohawal, Ayodhya, and 2 Others

Mohd. Shaan vs Addl. Commissioner Administration, Lucknow and Others

Om Prakash Tripathi vs Naib Tehsildar,Ram Nagar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others