Writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a recall application dismissed as infructuous because the authority had already allowed the recall application ex-parte.
Prayer for expeditious disposal of recall application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58058
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4001 of 2024
Petitioner :- Om Prakash Tripathi Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar,Ram Nagar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed this petition seeking expeditious disposal of his recall application. However, since the matter was listed before the authority concerned, who has allowed the recall application, the prayer as made in this petition has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 27.8.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Om Prakash Tripathi
Naib Tehsildar, Ram Nagar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar
Others
Jaspreet Singh
Shashank Shivhare
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
