Disposed

Smt. Nirmala v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda and Others

Allahabad HC28 Aug 2024/3987/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Matter under Article 227 filed seeking expedited disposal of a pending revision. Court directed respondent to decide the revision expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments following a co-ordinate bench order, disposing of the petition without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No.1 to consider and decide Revision No.828 expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments.

Smt. Nirmala Vs Deputy Director of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58687

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3987 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Nirmala Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjeet Singh,Abhijeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Notice on behalf of respondent No.2 has been accepted by Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.3 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Revision No.828 (Computerized Case No.202354083000000334), "Brij Vilas Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and others" pending before respondent No.1 since 03.04.2023.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Revision No.828 (Computerized Case No.202354083000000334), "Brij Vilas Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and others" considering the mandate of the order passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ-B No.210 of 2023 dated 23.03.2023, as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No.1 shall decide the aforesaid case of the petitioner strictly in accordance

¶13

with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 28.8.2024 Ashutosh

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Nirmala v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nirmala v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Puneet Ji Puri Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Saiyed Zaiuddin Husain Vs Board of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Ram Piyare @ Ram Piyare Prajapati Vs Upziladhikari (Nyayik), Tehsil Gauriganj, Amethi and Another

Jamuna Prasad Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lakhimpur Kheri and Others

Tripunayak Vs Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Ram Sahai Kashyap Vs Consolidation Officer, Gauriganj, Amethi