The application of counsel for the petitioner was accepted that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time, and the petition was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39748
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 395 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Heard.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous with the efflux of time and the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous at this stage.
Learned Counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.
The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous at this stage.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Consign to records.
Order Date :- 24.5.2024 Lokesh Kumar
Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Pawan Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Shree Prakash Singh
Lokesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
