Disposed¶13

Vinay Singh v. the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member and Others

Allahabad HC28 Aug 2024/3926/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 8; Jaspreet Singh, J.; Matters under Article 227 No. 3926 of 2024; decided 28.8.2024; expedite petition by Vinay Singh seeking early final decision of Case No. 602 of 2024 / computerized Case No. R2024042300602 (Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. Ram Singh and Others) pending before the Board of Revenue, U.P.; petition disposed of with direction to decide expeditiously, full opportunity of hearing, no unnecessary adjournments; Court did not examine merits.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to finally decide Case No. 602 of 2024 (computerized Case No. R2024042300602) expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing and without granting unnecessary adjournments; no examination of merits by this Court. ¶13

Vinay Singh Vs the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58435

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3926 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinay Singh Respondent :- The Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member And Others

¶4

Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitesh Pratap Singh,Abhijeet P. Singh Chauhan,Ashutosh Goswami,Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents Nos. 1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 11-Gaon Sabha.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos. 2 to 10 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No. 602 of 2024 computerized Case No. R2024042300602 (Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. Ram Singh and Others) pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No. 1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No. 602 of 2024 computerized Case No. R2024042300602 (Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. Ram Singh and Others) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 28.8.2024 Asheesh

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinay Singh v. the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Singh v. the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Puneet Ji Puri Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Saiyed Zaiuddin Husain Vs Board of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Ram Piyare @ Ram Piyare Prajapati Vs Upziladhikari (Nyayik), Tehsil Gauriganj, Amethi and Another

Jamuna Prasad Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lakhimpur Kheri and Others

Tripunayak Vs Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Ram Sahai Kashyap Vs Consolidation Officer, Gauriganj, Amethi