Dr. Shanta Rai Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush Lko and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Increment after superannuation retirement (retired 30th June; increment due 1st July not granted); time-bound disposal via fresh representation to respondent no.1 (Principal Secretary, Ayush, U.P.) within two weeks; decision by reasoned and speaking order within six weeks; merits expressly not gone into; disposed of on consent. Keywords: superannuation increment, retirement increment, representation, reasoned and speaking order, WRIT - A 3862 of 2024, 2024:AHC-LKO:37870, Abdul Moin, J., State of U.P. Ayush Department.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with consent; petitioner permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.1 within two weeks, which respondent no.1 is to decide by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within six weeks of submission along with certified copy of the order; merits of the increment claim not adjudicated.