Contempt applicant sought dismissal of the contempt application on the ground that the order had been complied with. The court allowed the application and dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous.
Contempt Application (Civil) No. 3821 of 2024 dismissed as infructuous; I.A. 1 of 2024 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3821 of 2024
Applicant :- Uma Shankar Opposite Party :- Medhi Lal, Consolidation Officer, Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
I.A. 1 of 2024
Heard Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant.
This is an application for dismissal of contempt petition on the ground that the order passed by the Court has been complied and the petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, the application is allowed . The Contempt Application (Civil) No. - 3821 of 2024 is dismissed as having become infructuous and consign to record.
Order Date :- 19.11.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed as infructuous since the order under contempt has been complied with.
Uma Shankar
Medhi Lal, Consolidation Officer, Ayodhya
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
