Disposed

Ghanshyam Singh v. Addl. Labour Commissioner Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC8 Aug 2024/3686/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Article 226 petition regarding delayed execution of an industrial award, the court disposed of the matter without adjudicating merits, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an urgency application for expeditious execution of the award before the Labour Commissioner.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early execution of the award before the respondent.

Ghanshyam Singh Vs Addl. Labour Commissioner Lko… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:54458

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3686 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Singh Respondent :- Addl. Labour Commissioner Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shankar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 1- Additional Labour Commissioner, Lucknow Region, Lucknow to decide the Execution Application No. 15/2023 for execution of award dated 11.7.2023 passed in Adjudication Case No. 18/2017 or in alternative direct the respondent no. 1 to issue Recovery Certificate against private respondents no. 2 to 5 for Execution of Award dated 11.7.2023 passed in Adjudication Case No. 18/2017 (Ghanshyam Singh Vs. M/s Sahara India & others) pending before him, within the time as specified by this Court.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extend that a direction may be issued to the respondent no. 1- Additional Labour Commissioner, Lucknow Region, Lucknow for execution of the aforesaid award, which is pending from the last about more than one year.

¶9

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early execution of the aforesaid award, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early execution of the aforesaid award, before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no. 1 within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of early execution of the aforesaid award,before the respondent no. 1. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that respondent no. 1 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in case there is no legal impediment and if any adjournment is unavoidable only short adjournment may be given.

¶12

Order Date :- 8.8.2024 Anuj Singh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ghanshyam Singh v. Addl. Labour Commissioner Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Singh v. Addl. Labour Commissioner Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohiuddin Vs D.J.Faizbad and Other

Kafeel Ahamad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home and 10 Others

Ram Ratan and 11 Others Vs Civil Judge South Junior Division Room No. 24 District Sultanpur and 10 Others

Divisional Organization Secy., Uttar Railway Karmchari Union Vs Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court and Another

Numaisha Begum and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Law) Lko. and 5 Others

Om Prakash Prajapati Vs Civil Judge (Junior Divison) (South) Court NO.24 Sultanpur and 3 Others